(The following are writing tips from the scholarly journal Jump Cut. Click here for the MLA and sourcing slides from class.)
A guide to instant self-editing
Many
JUMP CUT writers repeat the same writing problems. This guide points
out some of the most common errors and suggests emergency corrections.
Reading online lends itself to much shorter paragraphs than print.
Excessive passive construction
You can quickly identify passive verb forms, a
common problem in academic writing, by "to be" verbs before a form of
the main verb. Often used to avoid "I," they slow down your writing,
sound unnatural, and rob verbs of impact. Active verbs help readers,
provide variety, and add punch. Underline every passive construction and
try to limit yourself to one per paragraph on rewriting.
Failure to use the first person
Passive construction and the coy use of "one,"
"the author," etc. are evasive and lack personality. Use "I" to speak of
yourself and "we" to refer to what you, as writer, and the reader can
do together. (E.g., "I will argue..." or "From this we can see....")
Obviously, co-authored articles are an exception.
Excessive qualification
Pay attention to the difference between precision
and mealy-mouthed qualification. Be careful in using "might," "should,"
"often," "would seem," "perhaps," etc. Excessive qualification makes you
look timid and your argument halfhearted.
Excess prepositional phrases
Strings of prepositions slow down your writing;
you can reduce them by using possessives, adverbs, and adjectives to
make the same point. Put brackets around each prepositional phrase and
see how many you can eliminate.
Arch terms, translations, and unclear neologisms
"Nuance" as a verb is an anglicism that sounds
pretentious to US ears and destroys your credibility, as do other words
our readers don't commonly use in speaking. Check you vocabulary against
mundane general usage; if it seems unusual, see if you're gaining
anything by using it. For example, the figurative use of "foreground" as
a verb seldom means more than the everyday verb "to emphasize."
("Privilege," "articulate," "inflect," as verbs are similarly
questionable.) The literal translation of foreign critical terms without
explanation (e.g., "overdetermination," "difference," "problematic" as a
noun) confuses earnest readers who want to understand what you have to
say but don't have a pass key to the concepts. Similarly, casual and
careless use of critical terms which represent major (and often debated)
concepts inhibits clear communication (e.g., "Brechtian" and
"distanciation" must be used precisely). Use neologisms only if they
clarify and enhance the meaning.
Complicated clause construction
The "German" sentence rarely contributes to meaning in English. Wordiness is bad — always.
Clichés
Stand back from your writing and look for tired
and trite expressions such as: "intensely personal," "the bottom line,"
"there are a number of" (for "numerous").
While we are always ready to help nonnative
speakers of English get articles in shape, we have little time for
interesting pieces with severe style problems from native speakers. It's
up to the writer. Any standard college composition and grammar book
will elaborate on the above.
Style
In general, we use the current edition of the
Modern Language Association Style Manual, but we accept other recognized
styles such as U. of Chicago, and American Psychological Association
which are based on putting page references in the text and bibliography
at the end of the article. For example:
- In his article on psychedelic semiotics, Kleinhans asserts, "Barthes is far out!"(133). But he has also argued, "Barthes didn't know very much about dope." (Kleinhans 1968c, 12).
- Where appropriate give original publication date so it doesn't look like Karl Marx wrote something a few years ago. Or that Gramsci and Stuart Hall were contemporaries.