(The following are writing tips from the scholarly journal Jump Cut. Click here for the MLA and sourcing slides from class.)
A guide to instant self-editing
       Many
 JUMP CUT writers repeat the same writing problems. This guide points 
out some of the most common errors and suggests emergency corrections.  
Reading online lends itself to much shorter paragraphs than print.
Excessive passive construction
      
You can quickly identify passive verb forms, a 
common problem in academic writing, by "to be" verbs before a form of 
the main verb. Often used to avoid "I," they slow down your writing, 
sound unnatural, and rob verbs of impact. Active verbs help readers, 
provide variety, and add punch. Underline every passive construction and
 try to limit yourself to one per paragraph on rewriting.
Failure to use the first person
      
Passive construction and the coy use of "one," 
"the author," etc. are evasive and lack personality. Use "I" to speak of
 yourself and "we" to refer to what you, as writer, and the reader can 
do together. (E.g., "I will argue..." or "From this we can see....") 
Obviously, co-authored articles are an exception.
Excessive qualification
      
Pay attention to the difference between precision 
and mealy-mouthed qualification. Be careful in using "might," "should," 
"often," "would seem," "perhaps," etc. Excessive qualification makes you
 look timid and your argument halfhearted.
Excess prepositional phrases
      
Strings of prepositions slow down your writing; 
you can reduce them by using possessives, adverbs, and adjectives to 
make the same point. Put brackets around each prepositional phrase and 
see how many you can eliminate.
Arch terms, translations, and unclear neologisms
      
"Nuance" as a verb is an anglicism that sounds 
pretentious to US ears and destroys your credibility, as do other words 
our readers don't commonly use in speaking. Check you vocabulary against
 mundane general usage; if it seems unusual, see if you're gaining 
anything by using it. For example, the figurative use of "foreground" as
 a verb seldom means more than the everyday verb "to emphasize." 
("Privilege," "articulate," "inflect," as verbs are similarly 
questionable.) The literal translation of foreign critical terms without
 explanation (e.g., "overdetermination," "difference," "problematic" as a
 noun) confuses earnest readers who want to understand what you have to 
say but don't have a pass key to the concepts. Similarly, casual and 
careless use of critical terms which represent major (and often debated)
 concepts inhibits clear communication (e.g., "Brechtian" and 
"distanciation" must be used precisely). Use neologisms only if they 
clarify and enhance the meaning.
Complicated clause construction
      
The "German" sentence rarely contributes to meaning in English. Wordiness is bad — always.
Clichés
      
Stand back from your writing and look for tired 
and trite expressions such as: "intensely personal," "the bottom line," 
"there are a number of" (for "numerous").
While we are always ready to help nonnative 
speakers of English get articles in shape, we have little time for 
interesting pieces with severe style problems from native speakers. It's
 up to the writer. Any standard college composition and grammar book 
will elaborate on the above. 
Style
      
In general, we use the current edition of the 
Modern Language Association Style Manual, but we accept other recognized
 styles such as U. of Chicago, and American Psychological Association 
which are based on putting page references in the text and bibliography 
at the end of the article. For example:
- In his article on psychedelic semiotics, Kleinhans asserts, "Barthes is far out!"(133). But he has also argued, "Barthes didn't know very much about dope." (Kleinhans 1968c, 12).
- Where appropriate give original publication date so it doesn't look like Karl Marx wrote something a few years ago. Or that Gramsci and Stuart Hall were contemporaries.
